Friday, 6 April 2018

Reader's Response Final Draft

In the article ‘Duo turn plastic waste into a concrete idea,’ Goy (2016) states that BlueRen scientists and co-founders, Wong Chui Ling and Aravind Muthiah, have discovered an environmentally friendly method to convert plastic waste into carbon nanotubes by using different minerals as a catalyst during recycling. This is important as in 2014 alone, 869 000 tonnes of plastic waste was produced in Singapore but only 9% of it was recycled. This figure has been unchanged since 2001 according to Goy, and BlueRen’s approach has resulted in a 10% yield. Apart from that, these nanotubes are lightweight yet durable so nanotubes could be used as an additive in concrete making. Nanotubes helps to strengthen the concrete thus reducing the use of cement by 30%. The article quotes Aravind, who believes that this is what makes BlueRen unique as the“technology is about upcycling and converts plastic waste into high-value products."

I agree with Goy's point of view on the advantage of converting plastic waste into a high-value product to reduce the use of concrete. However, I think that the article is lacking in term of the negative health issues of using carbon nanotube and plastic recycling.

According to Doreen (2011), carbon nanotubes are stronger than steel, harder than diamond, as light as plastic. However, there are a lot of effects of the nanotubes on the environment that are unknown to the Earth. Firstly, it has shown that nanotubes are toxic to the human cell. Nanotubes can kill the cells easily. Also, carbon nanotubes have a similar effect as asbestos. Asbestos has been banned in 55 countries worldwide due to its harmful properties on humans. Before the ban, asbestos had been used to strengthen concrete and to insulate buildings. Thus, it would be dangerous for carbon nanotube to replace 30% of cement when the effect on humans is that severe. Kobayashi, Izumi, and Morimoto (2017) state that carbon nanotubes are causing an adverse health effect. It is especially true for human exposure through inhalation and dermal contact during manufacturing and handling process. The exposure to carbon nanotubes will "induce inflammation, fibrosis, lung cancer following long-term inhalation." Kobayashi, Izumi, and Morimoto also observed that long and thin carbon nanotubes resemble and function like asbestos fiber. Asbestos fibers are so harmful because they are so tiny that they can penetrate deep into the lungs yet taking way to long for the body's immune system to destroy it. The carbon nanotubes will line the victim's lungs causing fatal cancer which can take 30 to 40 years to surface after exposure. Therefore, it would be akin to killing the operators that are handling the carbon nanotube when mixing it with the cement.

According to Soffar (2016), plastic recycling can create environmental problems if it is not done right. When plastic is being recycled, heat is required to melt it down. The process of burning the plastic produces carbon emissions. One of the phenomena that contribute to the global warming in the planet is carbon emission This is because global warming will cause poor air quality due to the volatile organic compounds tainting it.. Also, volatile organic compounds are being discharged during plastic recycling. Volatile organic compounds are harmful to nearby animals and plants. Volatile organic compounds also presents health risks to people that use the recycled plastic as the plastic resin is made from petroleum. Therefore, leaching into food that is packaged in the containers.

In conclusion, before it is too late to flag out potential dangers of the nanotube, there is a pressing necessity to examine how carbon nanotubes are being used and see if there is any chance that people are being exposed to the dangerous material to reduce the amount of health hazard that it poses to the humans’ health.

Reference

Dooren, J. V. (2012, September 5). Carbon nanotubes have unexpected negative impact on environment. Bits of Science. Retrieved February 04, 2018, from http://www.bitsofscience.org/carbon-nanotube-environment-toxicity-4038/

Greenermeier. L. (2008, May 20). Study says carbon nanotubes as dangerous as asbestos . Scientific American. Retrieved February 04, 2018 from https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/carbon-nanotube-danger/

Kobayashi. N., Izumi. H., & Morimoto. Y, (2017, August 8). Review of toxicity studies of carbon nanotubes. Retrieved February 04, 2018 from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28794394

Luanpitpong. S., Wang. L., & Rojanasakul. Y. (2016, January 12). The effects of carbon nanotubes on lung and dermal cellular behaviours. Retrieved February 04, 2018 fromhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4710349/

Soffar. H. (2016, July 27). Plastic recycling advantages and disadvantages. Online Sciences. Retrieved February 04, 2018 from https://www.online-sciences.com/industries/plastic-recycling-advantages-and-disadvantages/

1 comment:

Personal statement

Gordon Ho Gordon is an undergraduate in Singapore Institute Of Technology (SIT) and had four years of civil engineering experience. He pre...